For the year ended 31 December
| 2005 | 2006 | Figures in million | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||
| SA Rands | US Dollars | ||||||||||||||
| 31 | Environmental rehabilitation and other provisions | ||||||||||||||
| Environmental rehabilitation obligations | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for decommissioning | |||||||||||||||
| 566 | 908 | Balance at beginning of year | 143 | 100 | |||||||||||
| – | (19) | Adjustments due to disposal of assets | (3) | – | |||||||||||
| 282 | 245 | Change in estimates (1) | 36 | 44 | |||||||||||
| 21 | 38 | Unwinding of decommissioning obligation (note 7) | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||
| – | (2) | Utilised during the year | – | – | |||||||||||
| 39 | 55 | Translation | (7) | (4) | |||||||||||
| 908 | 1,225 | Balance at end of year | 175 | 143 | |||||||||||
| Provision for restoration | |||||||||||||||
| 658 | 1,235 | Balance at beginning of year | 194 | 117 | |||||||||||
| – | (17) | Adjustments due to disposal of assets | (2) | – | |||||||||||
| 149 | 11 | Charge to income statement | 2 | 23 | |||||||||||
| 408 | (33) | Change in estimates (1) | (5) | 64 | |||||||||||
| 40 | 71 | Unwinding of restoration obligation (note 7) | 10 | 6 | |||||||||||
| (65) | (67) | Utilised during the year | (10) | (10) | |||||||||||
| 45 | 100 | Translation | (3) | (6) | |||||||||||
| 1,235 | 1,300 | Balance at end of year | 186 | 194 | |||||||||||
| Other provisions | |||||||||||||||
| 70 | 122 | Balance at beginning of year | 19 | 13 | |||||||||||
| 72 | 137 | Charge to income statement | 20 | 11 | |||||||||||
| (36) | (29) | Utilised during the year | (4) | (6) | |||||||||||
| 16 | 30 | Translation | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 122 | 260 | Balance at end of year | 37 | 19 | |||||||||||
| Other provisions comprise the following: | |||||||||||||||
| 119 | 186 | Provision for labour and civil claim court settlements in South America (2) | 26 | 19 | |||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | Provision for employee compensation claims in Australia (3) | 1 | – | |||||||||||
| – | 60 | Provision for onerous uranium contracts (4) | 9 | – | |||||||||||
| Provision for long-term management incentives in Nufcor | |||||||||||||||
| – | 8 | International Limited | 1 | – | |||||||||||
| 122 | 260 | 37 | 19 | ||||||||||||
| 2,265 | 2,785 | Total environmental rehabilitation and other provisions | 398 | 356 | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| 32 | Provision for pension and post-retirement benefits | |||||||
| Defined benefit plans | ||||||||
| The group has made provision for pension provident and medical schemes covering substantially all employees. The retirement schemes consist of the following: | ||||||||
| (51) | (267) | AngloGold Ashanti Pension Fund (asset) | (38) | (8) | ||||
| 1 | 5 | Ashanti Retired Staff Pension Plan | 1 | – | ||||
| 58 | 62 | Obuasi Mines Staff Pension Scheme | 9 | 9 | ||||
| Post-retirement medical scheme for AngloGold Ashanti South | ||||||||
| 1,172 | 1,094 | African employees | 156 | 185 | ||||
| (16) | (17) | Post-retirement medical scheme for Rand Refinery employees (asset) | (2) | (2) | ||||
| 12 | 13 | Retiree Medical Plan for North American employees | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (SERP) for North America | ||||||||
| 6 | 7 | (USA) Inc employees | 1 | 1 | ||||
| (1) | (1) | Retiree Medical Plan for Nufcor South Africa employees (asset) | – | – | ||||
| 1,181 | 896 | Sub-total | 129 | 187 | ||||
| Transferred to other non-current assets (note 22) | ||||||||
| 51 | 267 | AngloGold Ashanti Pension Fund | 38 | 8 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | Retiree Medical Plan for Nufcor South Africa employees | – | – | ||||
| 16 | 17 | Post-retirement medical scheme for Rand Refinery employees | 2 | 2 | ||||
| 1,249 | 1,181 | 169 | 197 | |||||
| AngloGold Ashanti Pension Fund | ||||||||
| The plan is evaluated by independent actuaries on an annual basis as at 31
December of each year. The valuation as at 31 December 2006 was completed at the
beginning of 2007 using the projected unit credit method. In arriving at their
conclusions, the actuaries took into account reasonable long-term estimates of
inflation, increases in wages, salaries and pension as well as returns on
investments.
A formal statutory valuation is required by legislation every three years. The previous statuary valuation was carried out with an effective date of 31 December 2005, and was completed in June of 2006. The next statutory valuation will have an effective date no later than 31 December 2008. All South African pension funds are governed by the Pension Funds Act of 1956 as amended. |
||||||||
| Information with respect to the AngloGold Ashanti Pension | ||||||||
| Fund is as follows: | ||||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||||
| 1,219 | 1,408 | Balance at beginning of year | 222 | 216 | ||||
| 40 | 50 | Current service cost | 7 | 6 | ||||
| 88 | 108 | Interest cost | 16 | 14 | ||||
| 13 | 12 | Participants’ contributions | 2 | 2 | ||||
| 200 | 84 | Actuarial loss | 12 | 31 | ||||
| (152) | (94) | Benefits paid | (14) | (24) | ||||
| – | – | Translation | (21) | (23) | ||||
| 1,408 | 1,568 | Balance at end of year | 224 | 222 | ||||
| Change in plan assets | ||||||||
| 1,150 | 1,459 | Balance at beginning of year | 230 | 204 | ||||
| 106 | 146 | Expected return on plan assets | 22 | 16 | ||||
| 260 | 272 | Actuarial gain | 40 | 41 | ||||
| 82 | 40 | Company contributions | 6 | 13 | ||||
| 13 | 12 | Participants’ contributions | 2 | 2 | ||||
| (152) | (94) | Benefits paid | (14) | (24) | ||||
| – | – | Translation | (24) | (22) | ||||
| 1,459 | 1,835 | Fair value of plan assets at end of year | 262 | 230 | ||||
| 51 | 267 | Funded status at end of year | 38 | 8 | ||||
| 51 | 267 | Net amount recognised (note 22) | 38 | 8 | ||||
| Pension benefit obligation | ||||||||
| 1,408 | 1,568 | Benefit obligation | 224 | 222 | ||||
| 1,459 | 1,835 | Fair value of plan assets | 262 | 230 | ||||
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||||
| 40 | 50 | Current service cost | 7 | 6 | ||||
| 88 | 108 | Interest cost | 16 | 14 | ||||
| (106) | (146) | Expected return on assets | (22) | (16) | ||||
| 22 | 12 | Net periodic benefit cost | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Assumptions | ||||||||
| Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the | ||||||||
| year are as follows: | ||||||||
| Discount rate | 8.00% | 7.75% | ||||||
| Rate of compensation increase (1) | 5.50% | 5.00% | ||||||
| Expected long-term return on plan assets | 10.50% | 10.14% | ||||||
| Pension increase | 4.28% | 4.05% | ||||||
|
||||||||
| The expected long-term return on plan assets is determined using the after tax yields of the various asset classes as a guide. | ||||||||
| Plan assets | ||||||||
| AngloGold Ashanti’s pension plan asset allocations at the end of the | ||||||||
| year, by asset category, are as follows: | ||||||||
| Asset category | ||||||||
| Equity securities | 68% | 69% | ||||||
| Debt securities | 28% | 30% | ||||||
| Other | 4% | 1% | ||||||
| 100% | 100% | |||||||
| Investment policy | ||||||||
| The Trustees have adopted a long-term horizon in formulating the Fund’s
investment strategy, which is consistent with the term of the Fund’s
liabilities. The investment strategy aims to provide a reasonable return
relative to inflation across a range of market conditions.
The Trustees have adopted different strategic asset allocations for the assets backing pensioner and active member liabilities. The strategic asset allocation defines what proportion of the Fund’s assets should be invested in each major asset class. The Trustees have then selected specialist investment managers to manage the assets in each asset class according to specific performance mandates instituted by the Trustees. The Trustees have also put in place a detailed Statement of Investment Principles that sets out the Fund’s overall investment philosophy and strategy. Fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis, and the performance of the managers and Fund as a whole is formally reviewed by the Fund’s Investment Sub-Committee at least every six months. |
| 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
| Percentage | Percentage | ||||||||
| Figures in million | Number | of total | of total | ||||||
| of shares | assets | Fair value | assets | Fair value | |||||
| US Dollars | |||||||||
| Related parties | |||||||||
| Investments held in related parties are summarised as follows: | |||||||||
| Equity securities | |||||||||
| Anglo American | 40,400 | 0.8% | 2 | 11.9% | 27 | ||||
| AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 32,960 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | ||||
| Fellow subsidiaries of Anglo American plc group to April 2006 (1) | |||||||||
| Anglo Platinum Group | 13.5% | 31 | |||||||
| The Tongaat-Hulett Group | 1.1% | 3 | |||||||
| 4 | 63 | ||||||||
| Other investments exceeding 5% of total plan assets | |||||||||
| Bonds | |||||||||
| RSA 2015 Government Bonds 13.5% | – | 5.4% | 18 | ||||||
| RSA 2010 Government Bonds 13% | – | 7.8% | 12 | ||||||
| – | 30 | ||||||||
| No investment exceeded 5% of total plan assets in 2006. | |||||||||
| SA Rands | |||||||||
| Related parties | |||||||||
| Investments held in related parties are summarised as follows: | |||||||||
| Equity securities | |||||||||
| Anglo American | 40,400 | 0.8% | 14 | 11.9% | 174 | ||||
| AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 32,960 | 0.6% | 11 | 0.8% | 11 | ||||
| Fellow subsidiaries of Anglo American plc group to April 2006 (1) | |||||||||
| Anglo Platinum Group | 13.5% | 198 | |||||||
| The Tongaat-Hulett Group | 1.1% | 15 | |||||||
| 25 | 398 | ||||||||
| Other investments exceeding 5% of total plan assets | |||||||||
| Bonds | |||||||||
| RSA 2015 Government Bonds 13.5% | – | 5.4% | 113 | ||||||
| RSA 2010 Government Bonds 13% | – | 7.8% | 79 | ||||||
| – | 192 | ||||||||
| No investment exceeded 5% of total plan assets in 2006. | |||||||||
| Cash flows | |||||||||
| Contributions | |||||||||
| The company expects to contribute $6 million, R40 million | |||||||||
| (2006: $7 million, R46 million) to its pension plan in 2007. | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
| 2005 | 2006 | Figures in million | 2006 | 2005 | ||
| SA Rands | US Dollars | |||||
| Estimated future benefit payments | ||||||
| The following pension benefit payments, which reflect the expected | ||||||
| future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: | ||||||
| 96 | 2007 | 14 | ||||
| 94 | 2008 | 13 | ||||
| 92 | 2009 | 13 | ||||
| 91 | 2010 | 13 | ||||
| 90 | 2011 | 13 | ||||
| 1,105 | Thereafter | 158 | ||||
| South American Brasil Fundambr?s pension plan | ||||||
| On 30 November 1998, the defined benefit fund was converted to a defined contribution fund with an actuarial net liability of $6 million, R51 million. This liability was revised annually by Mercer, the plan's actuary. The transfer of funds was approved by the governmental SPC agency and the actuarial net liability of $10 million, R61 million was funded and transferred to a defined contribution plan on 30 September 2005. | ||||||
| Information with respect to the South American Brasil | ||||||
| Fundambr?s pension plan is as follows: | ||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||
| 126 | – | Balance at beginning of year | – | 22 | ||
| 13 | – | Interest cost | – | 2 | ||
| 3 | – | Actuarial loss | – | 1 | ||
| (160) | – | Settlements and curtailments | – | (25) | ||
| (6) | – | Benefits paid | – | (1) | ||
| 24 | – | Translation | – | 1 | ||
| – | – | Balance at end of year | – | – | ||
| Change in plan assets | ||||||
| 86 | – | Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | – | 15 | ||
| 8 | – | Expected return on plan assets | – | 1 | ||
| (99) | – | Settlements and curtailments | – | (15) | ||
| (6) | – | Benefits paid | – | (1) | ||
| 11 | – | Translation | – | – | ||
| – | – | Fair value of plan assets at end of year | – | – | ||
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||
| 13 | – | Interest cost | – | 2 | ||
| (8) | – | Expected return on plan assets | – | (1) | ||
| 5 | – | Net periodic benefit cost | – | 1 | ||
| Cash flows | ||||||
| Contributions | ||||||
| No company or participant contributions were made to this fund. | ||||||
| The fund has been discontinued and the fund assets transferred to a defined contribution fund. | ||||||
| Estimated future benefit payments | ||||||
| There are no future benefit payments as the fund was terminated on 30 September 2005. | ||||||
| Ashanti Retired Staff pension plan | ||||||
| The pension scheme provides a retirement benefit to former Ashanti employees that were based at the former London office. The scheme is closed to new members and participants are either retired or are deferred members. The plan is evaluated by actuaries on an annual basis using the projected unit credit funding method. No contributions are made to the plan and it is funded with a shortfall of $1 million, R5 million (2005: $0.2 million, R1 million). | ||||||
| Information with respect to the Ashanti Retired Staff pension plan is as follows: | ||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||
| 20 | 22 | Balance at beginning of year | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| 2 | 5 | Actuarial loss | 1 | – | ||
| (1) | 5 | Translation | 1 | – | ||
| 22 | 33 | Balance at end of year | 5 | 3 | ||
| Change in plan assets | ||||||
| 18 | 21 | Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 2 | Expected return on plan assets | – | – | ||
| 2 | 1 | Actuarial gain | – | – | ||
| – | 4 | Translation | 1 | – | ||
| 21 | 28 | Fair value of plan assets at end of year | 4 | 3 | ||
| (1) | (5) | Unfunded status at end of year | (1) | – | ||
| (1) | (5) | Net amount recognised | (1) | – | ||
| Pension benefit obligation | ||||||
| 22 | 33 | Benefit obligation | 5 | 3 | ||
| 21 | 28 | Fair value of plan assets | 4 | 3 | ||
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| (1) | (2) | Expected return on plan assets | – | – | ||
| – | (1) | Net periodic benefit cost | – | – | ||
| Assumptions | ||||||
| Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the year are as follows: | ||||||
| Discount rate | 5.00% | 5.00% | ||||
| Expected long-term return on plan assets | 6.13% | 6.07% | ||||
| Pension increase | 2.50% | 2.50% | ||||
| The expected long-term return on plan assets is determined using the after tax return of domestic bonds and fixed-term investments. | ||||||
| Plan assets | ||||||
| The Ashanti Retired Staff defined benefit pension plan asset allocations as at the end of the year, by asset category are as follows: | ||||||
| Asset category | ||||||
| Equity securities | 55% | 51% | ||||
| Debt securities | 40% | 41% | ||||
| Property | 1% | 2% | ||||
| Cash | 4% | 6% | ||||
| 100% | 100% | |||||
| Investment policy | ||||||
| The general policy of the fund is to select investments that will achieve an optimal return on the plan assets. | ||||||
| No investments are made in related party entities. | ||||||
| Cash flows | ||||||
| Contributions | ||||||
| No contributions are made to this fund since the fund is closed to new members and the current members are retired or deferred. | ||||||
| Estimated future benefit payments | ||||||
| The following benefit payments, which reflect the expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: | ||||||
| – | 2007 | – | ||||
| – | 2008 | – | ||||
| – | 2009 | – | ||||
| – | 2010 | – | ||||
| – | 2011 | – | ||||
| 33 | Thereafter | 5 | ||||
| Obuasi Mines Staff Pension Scheme | ||||||
| The scheme provides monthly payments in Ghanaian currency (indexed to the US dollar) to retirees until death. The benefits under the scheme are based on the years of service and the compensation levels of the covered retirees. The scheme is closed to new members and all the scheme participants are retired. The scheme is unfunded and accordingly, no assets related to the scheme are recorded. The scheme is evaluated by actuaries on an annual basis. | ||||||
| Information with respect to the Obuasi Mines Staff Pension Scheme is as follows: | ||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||
| 60 | 58 | Balance at beginning of year | 9 | 11 | ||
| 3 | – | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| (7) | 7 | Actuarial loss (gain) | 1 | (1) | ||
| (5) | (7) | Benefits paid | (1) | (1) | ||
| 7 | 4 | Translation | – | – | ||
| 58 | 62 | Balance at end of year | 9 | 9 | ||
| (58) | (62) | Unfunded status at end of year | (9) | (9) | ||
| (58) | (62) | Net amount recognised | (9) | (9) | ||
| Pension benefit obligation | ||||||
| 58 | 62 | Benefit obligation | 9 | 9 | ||
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||
| 3 | – | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| Assumptions | ||||||
| Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the year are as follows: | ||||||
| Discount rate | 5.0% | 4.0% | ||||
| Rate of compensation increase | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Pension increase | 4.5% | 3.0% | ||||
| Cash flows | ||||||
| Contributions | ||||||
| No contributions are made to this fund since the fund is closed to new members and the current members are all retired. | ||||||
| Estimated future benefit payments | ||||||
| The following pension benefit payments, which reflect the expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: | ||||||
| 7 | 2007 | 1 | ||||
| 7 | 2008 | 1 | ||||
| 7 | 2009 | 1 | ||||
| 7 | 2010 | 1 | ||||
| 7 | 2011 | 1 | ||||
| 27 | Thereafter | 4 | ||||
| Post-retirement medical scheme for AngloGold Ashanti South | ||||||
| African employees | ||||||
| The provision for post-retirement medical funding represents the provision for health care benefits for employees and retired employees and their registered dependants. The post-retirement benefit costs are assessed in accordance with the advice of independent professionally qualified actuaries. Theactuarial method used is the projected unit credit funding method. This scheme is unfunded. The last valuation was performed as at 31 December 2006. | ||||||
| Information with respect to the defined benefit liability is as follows: | ||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||
| 924 | 1,172 | Benefit obligation at beginning of year | 185 | 164 | ||
| 7 | 7 | Current service cost | 1 | 1 | ||
| 80 | 88 | Interest cost | 13 | 12 | ||
| 30 | 35 | Participants’ contributions | 5 | 5 | ||
| (105) | (112) | Benefits paid | (17) | (16) | ||
| 236 | (96) | Actuarial (gain) loss | (14) | 37 | ||
| – | – | Translation | (17) | (18) | ||
| 1,172 | 1,094 | Balance at end of year | 156 | 185 | ||
| (1,172) | (1,094) | Unfunded status at end of year | (156) | (185) | ||
| (1,172) | (1,094) | Net amount recognised | (156) | (185) | ||
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||
| 7 | 7 | Current service cost | 1 | 1 | ||
| 80 | 88 | Interest cost | 13 | 12 | ||
| 87 | 95 | Net periodic benefit cost | 14 | 13 | ||
| The assumptions used in calculating the above amounts at year end are: | ||||||
| Discount rate | 8.00% | 7.75% | ||||
| Expected increase in health care costs | 4.75% | 5.00% | ||||
| Assumed health care cost trend rates at 31 December: | ||||||
| Health care cost trend assumed for next year | 4.75% | 5.00% | ||||
| Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) | 4.75% | 5.00% | ||||
| Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend | N/A | N/A | ||||
| 1% point increase |
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A 1% point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effect: | 1% point increase |
||||
| 10 | Effect on total service and interest cost | 1 | ||||
| 111 | Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation | 16 | ||||
| 1% point | 1% point | |||||
| decrease | decrease | |||||
| (9) | Effect on total service and interest cost | (1) | ||||
| (95) | Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation | (14) | ||||
| Cash flows | ||||||
| Contributions | ||||||
| AngloGold Ashanti expects to contribute $25 million, R178 million (2006: $13 million, R82 million) to the post-retirement medical plan in 2007. | ||||||
| Estimated future benefit payments | ||||||
| The following medical benefit payments, which reflect the expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: | ||||||
| 77 | 2007 | 11 | ||||
| 79 | 2008 | 11 | ||||
| 80 | 2009 | 11 | ||||
| 81 | 2010 | 12 | ||||
| 81 | 2011 | 12 | ||||
| 696 | Thereafter | 99 | ||||
| Post-retirement medical scheme for Rand Refinery employees | ||||||
| The Rand Refinery Retiree Medical Plan (Medipref) is a non-contributory defined benefit plan in respect of certain past qualifying employees. The accumulated post-employment medical aid obligation was determined by independent actuaries in September 2006 using the projected unit credit funding method. Movements that could impact the valuation between the interim date and the date of the balance sheet have been considered. The plan is fully funded and is evaluated by independent actuaries on an annual basis. | ||||||
| Information with respect to the post-retirement medical plan and obligation for the Rand Refinery Ltd past employees is as follows: | ||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||
| 16 | 16 | Balance at beginning of year | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| – | (1) | Actuarial gain | – | – | ||
| (1) | (1) | Benefits paid | – | – | ||
| – | – | Translation | (1) | – | ||
| 16 | 15 | Balance at end of year | 2 | 3 | ||
| Change in plan assets | ||||||
| 30 | 32 | Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | 5 | 5 | ||
| 3 | 2 | Expected return on plan assets | – | – | ||
| – | (1) | Actuarial loss | – | – | ||
| (1) | (1) | Benefits paid | – | – | ||
| – | – | Translation | (1) | – | ||
| 32 | 32 | Fair value of plan assets at end of year | 4 | 5 | ||
| 16 | 17 | Funded status at end of year | 2 | 2 | ||
| 16 | 17 | Net amount recognised (note 22) | 2 | 2 | ||
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| (3) | (2) | Expected return on plan assets | – | – | ||
| (2) | (1) | Net periodic benefit cost | – | – | ||
| Assumptions | ||||||
| Assumptions used at year end are as follows: | ||||||
| Discount rate | 8.50% | 7.75% | ||||
| Expected increase in health care costs | 6.50% | 5.75% | ||||
| Expected return on plan assets | 7.77% | 7.26% | ||||
| Assumed health care cost trend rates at 31 December: | ||||||
| Health care cost trend assumed for next year | 6.50% | 5.75% | ||||
| Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) | 6.50% | 5.75% | ||||
| Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend | N/A | N/A | ||||
| 1% point increase |
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A 1% point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effect: | 1% point increase |
||||
| – | Effect on total service and interest cost | – | ||||
| 1 | Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation | – | ||||
| 1% point | 1% point | |||||
| decrease | decrease | |||||
| – | Effect on total service and interest cost | – | ||||
| (1) | Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation | – | ||||
| Plan assets | ||||||
| The asset allocation of the Rand Refinery post retirement medical fund as at the end of the year, by asset category, is as follows: | ||||||
| Asset category | ||||||
| Debt securities | 76% | 75% | ||||
| Cash | 24% | 25% | ||||
| 100% | 100% | |||||
| No investments are made in related party entities. | ||||||
| Cash flows | ||||||
| Contributions | ||||||
| Rand Refinery Limited does not make a contribution to the scheme as the scheme is closed to new members and the current members are retired. | ||||||
| Estimated future benefit payments | ||||||
| The following medical benefit payments, which reflect the expected | ||||||
| future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: | ||||||
| 1 | 2007 | – | ||||
| 1 | 2008 | – | ||||
| 1 | 2009 | – | ||||
| 2 | 2010 | – | ||||
| 2 | 2011 | – | ||||
| 10 | Thereafter | 2 | ||||
| Retiree Medical Plan for North American employees | ||||||
| AngloGold Ashanti USA provides health care and life insurance benefits for certain retired employees under the AngloGold North America Retiree Medical Plan (the Retiree Medical Plan). With effect from 31 December 1999, no additional employees were eligible to receive post-retirement benefits under the Retiree Medical Plan. Curtailment accounting was applied at 31 December 1999. | ||||||
| The Retiree Medical Plan is a non-contributory defined benefit plan. This plan is evaluated by independent actuaries on an annual basis. It was last evaluated by independent actuaries in September 2006 who took into account reasonable long-term estimates of increases in health care costs and mortality rates in determining the obligations of AngloGold Ashanti USA under the Retiree Medical Plan. The evaluation of the Retiree Medical Plan reflected liabilities of $2 million, R13 million (2005: $2 million, R12 million). The Retiree Medical Plan is an unfunded plan. The Retiree Medical Plan is evaluated using the projected unit credit funding method. The company does not share in future cost increases and therefore the rate of compensation increase is not applicable. | ||||||
| Information with respect to the Retiree Medical Plan is as follows: | ||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||
| 11 | 12 | Balance at beginning of year | 2 | 2 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| (1) | (1) | Benefit paid | – | – | ||
| 1 | 1 | Translation | – | – | ||
| 12 | 13 | Balance at end of year | 2 | 2 | ||
| (12) | (13) | Unfunded status at end of year | (2) | (2) | ||
| (12) | (13) | Net amount recognised | (2) | (2) | ||
| Net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs include: | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| 1 | 1 | Net periodic benefit cost | – | – | ||
| Assumptions used in calculating benefit obligations at the end of the year are as follows: | ||||||
| Discount rate | 5.0% | 5.5% | ||||
| Benefits are fixed and independent from inflation and consequently health care increases are not relevant. | ||||||
| Cash flows | ||||||
| Contributions | ||||||
| No contributions are made to this fund since the fund is closed to new members and the current members are all retired. | ||||||
| Estimated future benefit payments | ||||||
| The following pension benefit payments, which reflect the expected | ||||||
| future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: | ||||||
| – | 2007 | – | ||||
| – | 2008 | – | ||||
| – | 2009 | – | ||||
| – | 2010 | – | ||||
| – | 2011 | – | ||||
| 13 | Thereafter | 2 | ||||
| Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan for North America (USA) Inc. employees | ||||||
| Certain former employees of Minorco (USA) Inc. were covered under the Minorco (USA) Inc. Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (The SERP), a non-contributory defined benefit plan. The SERP was last evaluated by independent actuaries in September 2006 who took into account long-term estimates of inflation and mortality rates in determining the obligation of AngloGold Ashanti USA under the SERP. This evaluation of the SERP reflected plan liabilities of $1 million, R7 million (2005: $1 million, R6 million). The SERP is an unfunded plan and is evaluated by actuaries on an annual basis using the projected unit credit funding method. | ||||||
| Information with respect to the SERP is as follows: | ||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||
| 6 | 6 | Balance at beginning and end of year | 1 | 1 | ||
| – | – | Interest cost | – | – | ||
| – | (1) | Benefit paid | – | – | ||
| – | 2 | Translation | – | – | ||
| 6 | 7 | Balance at end of year | 1 | 1 | ||
| (6) | (7) | Unfunded status at end of year | (1) | (1) | ||
| (6) | (7) | Net amount recognised | (1) | (1) | ||
|
There is no net periodic pension and post-retirement cost during 2005 and 2006.
The discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation at 31 December was 5%
(2005: 5.5%). |
||||||
|
No contributions are made to this fund since the fund is closed to new members
and the current members are all retired. |
||||||
| Estimated future benefit payments | ||||||
| The pension benefit payments, which reflect the expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid after 2011 and amount to $1 million, R7 million. | ||||||
| Nuclear Fuels South Africa (NUFCOR) – Retiree Medical Plan for Nufcor South African employees | ||||||
| The Nufcor South Africa Retiree Medical Plan (Mascom) is a defined benefit plan in respect of certain past qualifying employees. The accumulated post-employment medical aid obligation was determined by independent actuaries in September 2006 using the projected unit credit funding method. Movements that could impact the valuation between the interim date and the date of the balance sheet have been considered. The plan is fully funded. | ||||||
| Information with respect to the Retiree Medical Plan for Nufcor | ||||||
| South Africa employees is as follows: | ||||||
| Change in benefit obligation | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | Balance at beginning of year | – | – | ||
| (1) | (1) | Benefit paid | – | – | ||
| 1 | 1 | Actuarial loss | – | – | ||
| 2 | 2 | Balance at end of year | – | – | ||
| Change in plan assets | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | – | – | ||
| 1 | 1 | Expected return on plan assets | – | – | ||
| 1 | – | Employee contributions | – | – | ||
| (1) | (1) | Benefits paid | – | – | ||
| 3 | 3 | Fair value of plan assets at end of year | – | – | ||
| 1 | 1 | Funded status at end of year | – | – | ||
| 1 | 1 | Net amount recognised (note 22) | – | – | ||
| Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||
| (1) | (1) | Expected return on plan assets | – | – | ||
| Assumptions | ||||||
| Assumptions used at year end are as follows: | ||||||
| Discount rate | 8.50% | 7.75% | ||||
| Expected increase in health care costs | 6.50% | 5.75% | ||||
| Expected return on plan assets | 8.50% | 7.75% | ||||
| Assumed health care cost trend rates at 31 December: | ||||||
| Health care cost trend assumed for next year | 6.50% | 5.75% | ||||
| Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline | ||||||
| (the ultimate trend rate) | 6.50% | 5.75% | ||||
| Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Cash flows | ||||||
| Contributions | ||||||
| No contributions are made to this fund since
the fund is closed to new members and the current members are all retired. |
||||||
|
Estimated future benefit payments The medical benefit payments, which reflect the expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid after 2011 and amount to $0.1 million, R1 million. |
||||||
|
Plan assets The asset allocation of the Nufcor South Africa post-retirement medical fund as at the end of the year, by asset category, is as follows: |
||||||
| Asset category | ||||||
| Unit trust investment funds | 100% | 100% | ||||
|
No investments are made in related party entities. |
||||||
|
Defined Contribution Funds Contributions to the various retirement schemes are fully expensed during the year in which they are funded and the cost of contributing to retirement benefits for the year amounted to $40 million, R274 million (2005: $31 million, R199 million). |
||||||
|
Australia The region contributes to the Australian Retirement Fund for the provision of benefits to employees and their dependants on retirement, disability or death. The fund is a multi-industry national fund with defined contribution arrangements. Contribution rates by the operation on behalf of employees varies, with minimum contributions, meeting compliance requirements under the Superannuation Guarantee legislation. Members also have the option of contributing to approved personal superannuation funds. The contributions by the operation are legally enforceable to the extent required by the Superannuation Guarantee legislation and relevant employment agreements. The cost to the group of all these contributions amounted to $2 million, R14 million (2005: $2 million, R12 million). |
||||||
| Ghana and Guinea | |
| AngloGold Ashanti mines in Ghana and Guinea
contribute to provident plans for their employees which are defined
contribution plans. The funds are administered by boards of Trustees and
invest mainly in Ghana and Guinea governments' treasury instruments, fixed
term deposits and other projects. The cost of these contributions were $3
million, R21 million (2005: $3 million, R20 million).
Mali (Sadiola, Yatela and Morila)
Namibia (Navachab)
North America
South Africa
South America
Tanzania (Geita) |
| 2005 | 2006 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
| SA Rands | Figures in million | US Dollars | |||||
| 33 | Deferred taxation | ||||||
| Deferred taxation relating to temporary differences is made up as follows: | |||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||
| 9,391 | 11,293 | Tangible assets | 1,613 | 1,480 | |||
| 115 | 107 | Inventories | 15 | 18 | |||
| 189 | 639 | Derivatives | 91 | 30 | |||
| 312 | 120 | Other | 17 | 49 | |||
| 10,007 | 12,159 | 1,736 | 1,577 | ||||
| Assets | |||||||
| 914 | 1,215 | Provisions | 173 | 144 | |||
| 1,099 | 2,321 | Derivatives | 331 | 173 | |||
| 841 | 1,117 | Tax assets | 160 | 132 | |||
| 112 | 216 | Other | 31 | 18 | |||
| 2,966 | 4,869 | 695 | 467 | ||||
| 7,041 | 7,290 | Net deferred taxation liability | 1,041 | 1,110 | |||
| Included in the balance sheet as follows: | |||||||
| 279 | 432 | Deferred tax assets | 62 | 44 | |||
| 7,320 | 7,722 | Deferred tax liabilities | 1,103 | 1,154 | |||
| 7,041 | 7,290 | Net deferred taxation liability | 1,041 | 1,110 | |||
| The movement on the deferred tax balance is as follows: | |||||||
| 7,615 | 7,041 | Balance at beginning of year | 1,110 | 1,349 | |||
| (1) | 15 | Taxation on fair value adjustments (note 28) | 2 | | |||
| (747) | (200) | Income statement charge (note 12) | (30) | (117) | |||
| 19 | (18) | Discontinued operations (note 13) | (2) | 3 | |||
| (377) | (167) | Taxation on other comprehensive income (note 28) | (25) | (58) | |||
| (68) | 102 | Taxation on actuarial gain (loss) (note 28) | 15 | (11) | |||
| 600 | 517 | Translation | (29) | (56) | |||
| 7,041 | 7,290 | Balance at end of year | 1,041 | 1,110 | |||
| No provision has been made for South African income tax or foreign tax that may result from future remittances of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries or foreign corporate joint ventures because it is expected that such earnings will not be distributed as a dividend in the foreseable future. Unrecognised taxable temporary differences pertaining to undistributed earnings totalled $353 million, R2,471 million at 31 December 2006 (2005: $282 million, R1,791 million). |
|||||||
| 34 | Trade, other payables and deferred income | ||||||
| Non-current | |||||||
| 87 | 150 | Deferred income | 21 | 14 | |||
| 87 | 150 | 21 | 14 | ||||
| Current | |||||||
| 1,374 | 2,040 | Trade creditors | 292 | 216 | |||
| 911 | 1,172 | Accruals | 167 | 144 | |||
| 31 | | Amounts due to related parties | | 5 | |||
| 36 | 136 | Deferred income | 19 | 6 | |||
| 321 | 289 | Unearned premiums on normal sale exempted contracts | 41 | 51 | |||
| 140 | 64 | Other creditors | 9 | 20 | |||
| 2,813 | 3,701 | 528 | 442 | ||||
| 2,900 | 3,851 | Total trade, other payables and deferred income | 549 | 456 | |||
| Current trade and other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled within 60 days. | |||||||
| 35 | Taxation | ||||||
| 368 | 710 | Balance at beginning of year | 112 | 65 | |||
| (188) | (968) | Payments during the year | (143) | (30) | |||
| 531 | 1,432 | Provision during the year (note 12) | 210 | 82 | |||
| 8 | 17 | Discontinued operations (note 13) | 2 | 2 | |||
| (9) | 43 | Translation | (5) | (7) | |||
| 710 | 1,234 | Balance at end of year | 176 | 112 | |||
| 36 | Cash generated from operations | ||||||
| (1,106) | 859 | Profit (loss) before taxation | 168 | (158) | |||
| Adjusted for: | |||||||
| 1,744 | 4,590 | Movement on non-hedge derivatives and other commodity contracts | 627 | 262 | |||
| 3,203 | 4,059 | Amortisation of tangible assets (notes 4, 9 and 16) | 597 | 503 | |||
| Finance costs and unwinding of decommissioning and | |||||||
| 690 | 822 | restoration obligations (note 7) | 123 | 108 | |||
| (153) | (528) | Deferred stripping | (75) | (24) | |||
| (155) | (218) | Interest receivable (note 3) | (32) | (25) | |||
| 444 | 161 | Operating special items | 22 | 68 | |||
| 13 | 13 | Amortisation of intangible assets (notes 4 and 17) | 2 | 2 | |||
| 211 | (137) | Fair value adjustment on option component of convertible bond | (16) | 32 | |||
| 265 | (160) | Environmental rehabilitation and other expenditure | (22) | 41 | |||
| (61) | | Termination of employee benefit plan | | (10) | |||
| (113) | 213 | Other non-cash movements | 27 | (18) | |||
| (714) | (875) | Movements in working capital | (140) | (108) | |||
| 4,268 | 8,799 | 1,281 | 673 | ||||
| Movements in working capital: | |||||||
| (1,086) | (1,852) | Increase in inventories | (211) | (123) | |||
| (46) | (27) | Decrease (increase) in trade and other receivables | 19 | 23 | |||
| 418 | 1,004 | Increase (decrease) in trade and other payables | 52 | (8) | |||
| (714) | (875) | (140) | (108) | ||||
| 37 | Related parties | ||||||||||||||
| Details of material transactions with those related parties not dealt with elsewhere in the financial statements are summarised below: | |||||||||||||||
| Purchases | Amounts | Purchases | Amounts | ||||||||||||
| by (from) | owed to (by) | by (from) | owed to (by) | ||||||||||||
| related | related | related | related | ||||||||||||
| Figures in million | parties | parties | parties | parties | |||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
| US Dollars | |||||||||||||||
| Significant shareholder Anglo American for the year | 1 | | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Fellow subsidiaries of the Anglo American group to 20 April 2006 (1) | |||||||||||||||
| Anglo Coal a division of Anglo Operations Limited | | | 1 | | |||||||||||
| Boart Longyear Limited mining services (2) | | | 5 | | |||||||||||
| Haggie Steel Wire Rope Operations (3) | 1 | | 8 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Mondi Limited timber | 5 | | 16 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Scaw Metals a division of Anglo Operations Limited | |||||||||||||||
| steel and engineering | 1 | | 6 | 1 | |||||||||||
| The Tongaat-Hulett Group Limited | | | | | |||||||||||
| Joint ventures of AngloGold Ashanti Limited | |||||||||||||||
| BGM Management Company Pty Ltd | | | | | |||||||||||
| Societé d Exploitation des Mines d Or de Sadiola S.A. | 2 | (1) | | | |||||||||||
| Societé d Exploitation des Mines d Or de Yatela S.A. | 1 | | | | |||||||||||
| Societé des Mines de Morila S.A. | 2 | | (2) | | |||||||||||
| SA Rands | |||||||||||||||
| Significant shareholder Anglo American for the year | 7 | | 30 | 7 | |||||||||||
| Fellow subsidiaries of the Anglo American group to 20 April 2006 (1) | |||||||||||||||
| Anglo Coal a division of Anglo Operations Limited | 1 | | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Boart Longyear Limited mining services (2) | | | 30 | | |||||||||||
| Haggie Steel Wire Rope Operations (3) | 7 | | 50 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Mondi Limited timber | 30 | | 105 | 11 | |||||||||||
| Scaw Metals a division of Anglo Operations Limited steel and engineering | 9 | | 40 | 4 | |||||||||||
| The Tongaat-Hulett Group Limited | | | 1 | | |||||||||||
| Joint ventures of AngloGold Ashanti Limited | |||||||||||||||
| BGM Management Company Pty Ltd | | | 1 | | |||||||||||
| Societé d Exploitation des Mines d Or de Sadiola S.A. | 14 | (2) | (3) | 1 | |||||||||||
| Societé d Exploitation des Mines d Or de Yatela S.A. | 10 | (2) | 3 | | |||||||||||
| Societé des Mines de Morila S.A. | 14 | (2) | (10) | | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2006 | Figures in million | 2006 | 2005 | |||
| SA Rands | US Dollars | ||||||
| 38 | Contractual commitments and contingencies | ||||||
| Operating leases | |||||||
| At 31 December 2006, the group was committed to making the following payments in respect of operating leases for amongst others, hire of plant and equipment and land and buildings. Certain contracts contain renewal options and escalation clauses for various periods of time. | |||||||
| Expiry within | |||||||
| 209 | 304 | One year | 43 | 33 | |||
| 163 | 181 | Between one and two years | 26 | 26 | |||
| 127 | 76 | Between two and five years | 11 | 20 | |||
| 2 | 5 | After five years | 1 | | |||
| 501 | 566 | 81 | 79 | ||||
| Finance leases | |||||||
| The group has finance leases for plant and equipment. These leases have terms of renewal but no purchase options and escalation clauses. Renewals are at the option of the specific entity that holds the lease. Future minimum lease payments under finance lease contracts together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments are as follows: | |||||||
| Present | Present | ||||||
| value of | Minimum | Minimum | value of | ||||
| payments | payments | payments | payments | ||||
| 2006 | 2006 | ||||||
| 35 | 45 | Within one year | 7 | 5 | |||
| 67 | 80 | Within one year but not more than five years | 11 | 10 | |||
| | | More than five years | | | |||
| 102 | 125 | Total minimum lease payments | 18 | 15 | |||
| | 23 | Less: amounts representing finance charges | 3 | | |||
| 102 | 102 | Present value of minimum lease payments | 15 | 15 | |||
| 2005 | 2005 | ||||||
| 28 | 44 | Within one year | 7 | 5 | |||
| 77 | 96 | Within one year but not more than five years | 15 | 12 | |||
| 2 | 2 | More than five years | | | |||
| 107 | 142 | Total minimum lease payments | 22 | 17 | |||
| | 35 | Less: amounts representing finance charges | 5 | | |||
| 107 | 107 | Present value of minimum lease payments | 17 | 17 | |||
| Capital commitments | |||||||
| Acquisition of tangible assets | |||||||
| 1,182 | 2,475 | Contracted for | 354 | 186 | |||
| 4,597 | 5,120 | Not contracted for | 731 | 725 | |||
| 5,779 | 7,595 | Authorised by the directors | 1,085 | 911 | |||
| Allocated for: | |||||||
| Project expenditure | |||||||
| 1,204 | 2,572 | within one year | 367 | 190 | |||
| 671 | 1,855 | thereafter | 265 | 106 | |||
| 1,875 | 4,427 | 632 | 296 | ||||
| Stay-in-business expenditure | |||||||
| 3,628 | 2,925 | within one year | 418 | 572 | |||
| 276 | 243 | thereafter | 35 | 43 | |||
| 3,904 | 3,168 | 453 | 615 | ||||
| 50 | 124 | Share of underlying capital commitments of joint ventures | 18 | 8 | |||
| Purchase obligations | |||||||
| Contracted for | |||||||
| 1,221 | 1,920 | within one year | 274 | 192 | |||
| 1,288 | 1,327 | thereafter | 190 | 203 | |||
| 2,509 | 3,247 | 464 | 395 | ||||
| 990 | 906 | Share of underlying purchase obligations of joint ventures | 129 | 156 | |||
| Purchase obligations represent contractual obligations for the purchase of mining contract services, power, supplies, consumables, inventories, explosives and activated carbon.
|
|||||||
| To service the above capital commitments, purchase obligations and other operational requirements, the group is dependent on existing cash resources, cash generated from operations and borrowing facilities.
|
|||||||
| Cash generated from operations is subject to operational, market and other risks. Distributions from operations may be subject to foreign investment, exchange control laws and regulations and the quantity of foreign exchange available in offshore countries. In addition, distributions from joint ventures are subject to the relevant board approval.
|
|||||||
| The credit facilities and other finance arrangements contain financial covenants and other similar undertakings. To the extent that external borrowings are required, the groups covenant performance indicates that existing financing facilities will be available to meet the above commitments. To the extent that any of the financing facilities mature in the near future, the group believes that these facilities can be refinanced on similar terms to those currently in place.
|
|||||||
| This expenditure will be financed from existing cash resources, cash from operations and future borrowings. | |||||||
| Contingent liabilities | |||||||
| AngloGold Ashantis contingent liabilities at 31 December 2006 are detailed below: | |||||||
| Water pumping cost South Africa The group is involved in a legal dispute regarding the responsibility for water pumping of the Margaret shaft at the Stilfontein mine. Following an attempt by DRDGold Limited to liquidate its North West operations and avoid incurring pumping cost, AngloGold Ashanti Limited launched an urgent application against DRDGold Limited and government departments requesting the court to order the continued pumping of water at the Stilfontein mines. The cessation of water pumping is likely to cause flooding in various of the groups Vaal River operations. | |||||||
| The Department of Water Affairs and Forestry responded by issuing directives to the mining companies directing that they share the cost of pumping at the Stilfontein Margaret Shaft. | |||||||
| The three mining companies, Simmer and Jack Mines Limited, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited and AngloGold Ashanti Limited, are finalising an arrangement in which responsibility for the water pumping will be transferred to an independent newly formed company. The group's responsibility will be limited to providing one- third of the start-up capital on loan account and the three mining companies will be members of the newly formed company. | |||||||
| | | Should the proposed arrangement not be acceptable to the courts and/or regulatory authorities, the proposal may have to be amended. Due to the uncertainty no estimate is made of any potential liabilities as management believe that the proposed arrangement is a pragmatic and reasonable basis to resolve the issue. | | | |||
| | | The group has identified a number of groundwater pollution sites at its current operations in South Africa. The group has investigated a number of different technologies and methodologies that could possibly be used to remediate the pollution plumes. The viability of the suggested remediation techniques in the local geological formation in South Africa is however unknown. No sites have been remediated in South Africa. Present research and development work is focused on several pilot projects to find a solution that will in fact yield satisfactory results in South African conditions. Subject to the technology being developed as a remediation technique, no reliable estimate can be made for the obligation. | | | |||
| 185 | 329 | Sales tax on gold deliveries Brazil Mineração Serra Grande S.A.(MSG), the operator of the Crixas mine in Brazil, has received two tax assessments from the State of Goiás related to payments of sales taxes on gold deliveries for export: one for the period between February 2004 and June 2005 and the other for the period between July 2005 and May 2006. The tax authorities maintain that whenever a taxpayer exports gold mined in the State of Goiás through a branch located in a different Brazilian State, it must obtain an authorisation from the Goiás State Treasury by means of a Special Regime Agreement (Termo de Acordo re Regime Especial TARE). The MSG operation is co-owned with Kinross Gold Corporation. AGA manages the operation and its attributable share of the first assessment is approximately $29 million, R203 million. In May 2006 MSG signed the TARE, which authorised the remittance of gold to the companys branch in Minas Gerais specifically for export purposes. In November 2006 the administrative councils second chamber ruled in favour of MSG and fully cancelled the tax liability related to the first period. The State of Goiás may still appeal to the full board of the State of Goiás tax administrative council. The second assessment was issued by the State of Goiás in October 2006 on the same grounds as the first assessment, and the attributable share of the assessment is approximately $18 million, R126 million. AGA believes both assessments are in violation of Federal legislation on sales taxes. | 47 | 29 | |||
| | 32 | Morro Velho is involved in a dispute with the tax authorities, as a result of an erroneous duplication of a shipping invoice between two states in Brazil, tax authorities are claiming that VAT is payable on the second invoice. | 5 | | |||
| 35 | 39 | VAT Disputes Brazil MSG received a tax assessment in October 2003 from the State of Minas Gerais related to sales taxes on gold allegedly returned from the branch in Minas Gerais to the company head office in the State of Goiás. The tax administrators rejected the companys appeal against the assessment. The company is now dismissing the case at the judicial sphere. The companys attributable share of the assessment is approximately $6 million, R39 million. | 6 | 6 | |||
| 10 | 11 | Social security payments Brazil Anglogold Ashanti Brazil is being accused of failing to pay certain required payments towards the social security system in Brazil during the period 1997 to 2004. Legislation is unclear on whether the contributions are actually due and payable. The amount involved is approximately $2 million, R11 million. | 2 | 2 | |||
| 16 | 20 | A group of employees of Mining and Building Contractors (MBC), the Obuasi underground developer, are claiming to be employees of the group. If successful there is the risk of some employees claiming rights to share options. | 3 | 3 | |||
| 1 | 2 | The group has a potential liability at Navachab in Namibia to pay capital costs of the water pipeline and electricity supply to the mine in case of mine closure prior to 2019. Based on current life-of-mine business plans, the group believes the likelihood of this potential liability being realised to be more than remote but less than likely. | | | |||
| Guarantees | |||||||
| Financial guarantees | |||||||
| 100 | 100 | The group has provided surety in favour of the lender in respect of gold loan facilities to wholly-owned subsidiaries of Oro Group (Proprietary) Limited, an associate of the group. The group has a total maximum liability, in terms of the suretyships of R100 million, $ 14 million. The suretyship agreements have a termination notice period of 90 days. The group receives a fee from the associate for providing the surety and has provided for non-performance. | 14 | 16 | |||
| Hedging guarantees | |||||||
| 1,090 | 2,032 | AngloGold Ashanti Limited and its wholly-owned subsidiary AngloGold Ashanti Holdings plc have issued hedging guarantees to several counterparty banks in which they have guaranteed the due performance by the Geita Management Company Limited (GMC) of its obligations under or pursuant to the hedging agreements entered into by GMC, and to the payment of all money owing or incurred by GMC as and when due. This guarantee remains in force until no sum remains to be paid under the hedging agreements and the Bank has irrevocably recovered or received all sums payable to it under the hedging agreements. The maximum potential amount of future payments is all monies due, owing or incurred by GMC under or pursuant to the hedging agreements. At 31 December 2006 the marked-to-market valuation of the GMC hedge book was negative $290 million, R2,032 million of which $249 million, R1,741 million was raised on the balance sheet and the remainder treated under the NPNS exemption. | 290 | 172 | |||
| 4,591 | 7,334 | The group, together with its wholly-owned subsidiary, AngloGold Ashanti Holdings plc, has provided guarantees to several counterparty banks for the hedging commitments of its wholly owned subsidiary Ashanti Treasury Services Limited (ATS). At 31 December 2006, the marked-to-market valuation of the ATS hedge book was negative $1,047 million, R7,334 million, of which $ 251 million, R1,756 million was raised on the balance sheet while the remainder was treated under the NPNS exemption. | 1,047 | 723 | |||
| The group has issued gold delivery guarantees to several counterparty banks in which it guarantees the due performance of its subsidiaries AngloGold Ashanti USA Inc., AngloGold South America Limited and Cerro Vanguardia S.A. under their respective gold hedging agreements. | |||||||